Comparison between the WHO‐CFICPS and the PRISMA classification of safety‐related events in a radiation oncology department

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionDescribing Safety‐Related Events (SREs) in a radiotherapy (RT) department and comparing WHO‐CFICPS (World Health Organization's Conceptual Framework For The International Classification For Patient Safety) and PRISMA (Prevention and Recovery Information System for Monitoring and Analysis) methods for classifying SREs.MethodsFrom February 2017 to October 2020, two Quality Managers (QMs) randomly classified 1173 SREs using 13 incident types of WHO‐CFICPS. The same two QMs, reclassified the same SREs according to 20 PRISMA incident codes. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the association between the 13 incident types of WHO‐CFICPS and the 20 PRISMA codes. The chi‐squared and post‐hoc tests using adjusted standardized residuals were applied to detect the association between the two systems.ResultsThere was a significant association between WHO‐CFICPS incident types and PRISMA codes (P < 0.001). Ninety‐two percent of all SREs were categorized using 4 of 13 WHO‐CFICPS incident types including Clinical Process/Procedure (n = 448, 38.2%), Clinical Administration (n = 248, 21.1%), Documentation (n = 226, 19.2%) and Resources/Organizational Management (n = 15,613.3%). According to PRISMA classification, 14 of the 20 codes were used to describe the same SREs. PRISMA captured 41 Humans Skill Slips from 226 not better defined WHO‐CFICPS Documentation Incidents, 38 Human Rule‐based behaviour Qualification from not better defined 447 Clinical Process/Procedure and 40 Organization Management priority events from 156 not better defined WHO‐CFICPS Resources/Organizational Management events (P < 0.001).ConclusionAlthough there was a significant association between WHO‐CFICPS and PRISMA, The PRISMA method provides a more detailed insight into SREs compared to WHO‐CFICPS in a RT department.