Evaluation of deep‐learning TSE images in clinical musculoskeletal imaging

Author:

Vashistha Rajat12ORCID,Almuqbel Mustafa M3456,Palmer Nick J3,Keenan Ross J37,Gilbert Kevin3,Wells Scott3,Lynch Andrew3,Li Andrew3,Kingston‐Smith Stephen3,Melzer Tracy R458,Koerzdoerfer Gregor9,O'Brien Kieran12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. ARC Centre for Innovation in Biomedical Imaging Technology The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

2. Siemens Healthcare Pty Ltd Brisbane Queensland Australia

3. Pacific Radiology Group Christchurch New Zealand

4. New Zealand Brain Research Institute Christchurch New Zealand

5. Department of Medicine University of Otago Christchurch New Zealand

6. South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute Adelaide South Australia Australia

7. Department of Radiology Christchurch Hospital Christchurch New Zealand

8. School of Psychology, Speech and Hearing University of Canterbury Christchurch New Zealand

9. Siemens Healthineers AG Erlangen Germany

Abstract

SummaryIn this study, we compared the fat‐saturated (FS) and non‐FS turbo spin echo (TSE) magnetic resonance imaging knee sequences reconstructed conventionally (conventional‐TSE) against a deep learning‐based reconstruction of accelerated TSE (DL‐TSE) scans. A total of 232 conventional‐TSE and DL‐TSE image pairs were acquired for comparison. For each consenting patient, one of the clinically acquired conventional‐TSE proton density‐weighted sequences in the sagittal or coronal planes (FS and non‐FS), or in the axial plane (non‐FS), was repeated using a research DL‐TSE sequence. The DL‐TSE reconstruction resulted in an image resolution that increased by at least 45% and scan times that were up to 52% faster compared to the conventional TSE. All images were acquired on a MAGNETOM Vida 3T scanner (Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany). The reporting radiologists, blinded to the acquisition time, were requested to qualitatively compare the DL‐TSE against the conventional‐TSE reconstructions. Despite having a faster acquisition time, the DL‐TSE was rated to depict smaller structures better for 139/232 (60%) cases, equivalent for 72/232 (31%) cases and worse for 21/232 (9%) cases compared to the conventional‐TSE. Overall, the radiologists preferred the DL‐TSE reconstruction in 124/232 (53%) cases and stated no preference, implying equivalence, for 65/232 (28%) cases. DL‐TSE reconstructions enabled faster acquisition times while enhancing spatial resolution and preserving the image contrast. From these results, the DL‐TSE provided added or comparable clinical value and utility in less time. DL‐TSE offers the opportunity to further reduce the overall examination time and improve patient comfort with no loss in diagnostic accuracy.

Funder

Australian Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3