Comparative kinetic and kinematic evaluation of TPLO and TPLO combined with extra‐articular lateral augmentation: A biomechanical study

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesTo investigate stifle kinematics and kinetics following TPLO and TPLO combined with an extra‐articular lateral augmentation (TPLO‐IB) during the tibial compression test (TCT) and the tibial pivot compression test (TPT), applied with an external (eTPT) and an internal moment (iTPT).Study designExperimental ex vivo study.Sample populationTen cadaveric hindlimbs of dogs weighing 23–40 kg.Methods3D‐kinematic and kinetic data were collected while performing TCT, eTPT, and iTPT and compared under the conditions (1) normal, (2) CCL deficient, (3) TPLO, and (4) TPLO‐IB. Two‐way repeated‐measures ANOVA was used to examine the effect of test and treatment on kinetic and kinematic data.ResultsMean ± SD preoperative TPA was 24.7° ± 1.7°, postoperative TPA was 5.9° ± 0.7°. During TCT, there was no difference in cranial tibial translation between the intact stifle and after TPLO (p = .17). In contrast, cranial tibial translation was six times larger in TPLO compared to intact when performing eTPT and iTPT (p < .001). Cranial tibial translation with TCT, eTPT and iTPT was not different between intact stifle and TPLO‐IB. Intraclass correlation coefficient for eTPT and iTPT after TPLO and TPLO‐IB was excellent being 0.93 (0.70–0.99) and 0.91 (0.73–0.99), respectively.ConclusionWhereas TCT is negative after TPLO, instability persists when a rotational moment is combined using eTPT and iTPT. TPLO‐IB neutralizes craniocaudal and rotational instability when performing TCT, eTPT, and iTPT.