Affiliation:
1. University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison Wisconsin USA
Abstract
AbstractThis article is the first large‐scale study to document the speaking proficiency outcomes of intensive programs in less commonly taught languages in US higher education. Speaking proficiency was measured by pre‐ and postprogram ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interviews (N = 484) in 14 languages: Arabic, Bengali, Brazilian Portuguese, Hindi, Indonesian, Kazakh, Persian, Tamil, Thai, Tibetan, Turkish, Urdu, Uyghur, and Uzbek. The intensive programs are usually taught face‐to‐face but were offered fully online during the COVID‐19 pandemic. No significant difference in speaking proficiency outcomes, as measured by the ACTFL OPI, was found between the face‐to‐face and online formats. Students at all levels of instruction made significant gains in speaking proficiency, with greater gains made by students in Level 1 than at Levels 2‐3, and with wide variation within instructional levels. The average speaking proficiency outcomes were Advanced Low (Level 3), Intermediate High (Level 2), and between Intermediate Low and Intermediate Mid (Level 1).
Funder
American Council on The Teaching of Foreign Languages
Office of Postsecondary Education
Reference60 articles.
1. Laerd Statistics. (n.d.).Mixed ANOVA using SPSS Statistics.https://statistics.laerd.com/spss-tutorials/mixed-anova-using-spss-statistics.php.
2. An Integrated Curriculum in Collegiate‐Level German Studies with Accompanying Proficiency Ratings
3. Measuring oral proficiency in distance, face‐to‐face, and blended classrooms;Blake R.;Language Learning & Technology,2008