Randomised clinical trial: a 12‐strain bacterial mixture versus faecal microbiota transplantation versus vancomycin for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections

Author:

Rode Anne Abildtrup12ORCID,Chehri Mahtab34,Krogsgaard Laura Rindom1ORCID,Heno Kristine Klysner3,Svendsen Anna Tølbøll12ORCID,Ribberholt Iben3,Helms Morten23,Engberg Jørgen5,Schønning Kristian24,Tvede Michael6,Andersen Christian Østergaard4,Jensen Ulrich Stab5,Petersen Andreas Munk47ORCID,Bytzer Peter12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine Zealand University Hospital Koege Denmark

2. Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

3. Department of Infectious Diseases Hvidovre University Hospital Hvidovre Denmark

4. Department of Clinical Microbiology Hvidovre University Hospital Hvidovre Denmark

5. Department of Clinical Microbiology Zealand University Hospital Slagelse Denmark

6. MT MicroSearch by Michael Tvede COBIS Copenhagen Denmark

7. Department of Gastroenterology Hvidovre University Hospital Hvidovre Denmark

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundA defined bacterial mixture could be a safer alternative to faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT).AimsTo compare the efficacy of a 12‐strain mixture termed rectal bacteriotherapy with either FMT or vancomycin for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in an open‐label 3‐arm randomised controlled trial.MethodsWe screened all individuals positive for C difficile from May 2017 to March 2019. Persons with laboratory‐confirmed recurrent CDI were included. Before FMT and rectal bacteriotherapy, we pre‐treated with vancomycin for 7‐14 days. Rectal bacteriotherapy was applied by enema on three consecutive days and FMT by enema once with possible repetition for two to three infusions within 14 days. The vancomycin group was treated for 14 days with additional five weeks of tapering for multiple recurrences. The primary outcome was clinical cure within 90 days. A secondary outcome was 180‐day all‐cause mortality.ResultsParticipants in the FMT group (n = 34) were cured more often than participants receiving vancomycin (n = 31), 76% vs 45% (OR 3.9 (1.4‐11.4), P < 0.01) or rectal bacteriotherapy (n = 31), 76% vs 52% (OR 3.0 (1.1‐8.8), P = 0.04). Rectal bacteriotherapy and vancomycin performed similarly (P = 0.61). The mortality rate was 6% in the FMT group, 13% in the bacteriotherapy group and 23% in the vancomycin group. FMT tended to reduce mortality compared with vancomycin, OR 0.2 (0.04‐1.12), P = 0.07.ConclusionsRectal bacteriotherapy appears as effective as vancomycin but less effective than 1‐3 FMTs. FMT by enema with 1‐3 infusions is superior to vancomycin for treating recurrent C difficile infections and might reduce mortality.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Gastroenterology,Hepatology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3