Spastic dystonia: Still a valid term

Abstract

AbstractHypertonia in childhood may arise because of a variable combination of neuronal and non‐neuronal factors. Involuntary muscle contraction may be due to spasticity or dystonia, which represent disorders of the spinal reflex arch and of central motor output respectively. Whilst consensus definitions for dystonia have been established, definitions of spasticity vary, highlighting the lack of a single unifying nomenclature in the field of clinical movement science. The term spastic dystonia refers to involuntary tonic muscle contraction in the context of an upper motor neuron (UMN) lesion. This review considers the utility of the term spastic dystonia, exploring our understanding of the pathophysiology of dystonia and the UMN syndrome. An argument is advanced that spastic dystonia is a valid construct that warrants further exploration.What this paper adds There is no single universally accepted definitions for terms commonly used to describe motor disorders. Spasticity and dystonia are phenomenologically and pathophysiologically distinct entities. Spastic dystonia represents a subset of dystonia, but with pathophysiological mechanisms more in common with spasticity.