A dimensional analysis of experienced intensive care unit nurses' clinical decision‐making for bleeding after cardiac surgery

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBleeding following cardiac surgery is common and serious, yet a gap persists in understanding how experienced intensive care nurses identify and respond to such complications.AimTo describe the clinical decision‐making of experienced intensive care unit nurses in addressing bleeding after cardiac surgery.Study DesignThis qualitative study adopted the Recognition‐Primed Decision Model as its theoretical framework. Thirty‐nine experienced nurses from four adult intensive care units participated in semi‐structured interviews based on the critical decision method. The interviews explored their clinical judgements and decisions in bleeding situations, and data were analysed through dimensional analysis, an alternative to grounded theory.ResultsParticipants maintained consistent vigilance towards post‐cardiac surgery bleeding, recognizing it through a haemorrhagic dimension associated with blood loss and chest drainage and a hypovolemic dimension focusing on the repercussions of reduced blood volume. These dimensions organized their understanding of bleeding types (i.e., normal, medical, surgical, tamponade) and necessary actions. Their decision‐making encompassed monitoring bleeding, identifying the cause, stopping the bleeding, stabilizing haemodynamic and supporting the patient and family. Participants also adapted their actions to specific circumstances, including local practices, professional autonomy, interprofessional dynamics and resource availability.ConclusionsNurses' decision‐making was shaped by their personal attributes, the patient's condition and contextual circumstances, underscoring their expertise and pivotal role in anticipating actions and adapting to diverse conditions. The concept of actionability emerged as the central dimension explaining their decision‐making, defined as the capability to implement actions towards specific goals within the possibilities and constraints of a situation.Relevance to Clinical PracticeThis study underscores the need for continual updates to care protocols to align with current evidence and for quality improvement initiatives to close existing practice gaps. Exploring the concept of actionability further, developing adaptability‐focused educational programmes, and understanding decision‐making intricacies are crucial for informing nursing education and decision‐support systems.