The impact of organizational compassion in health care on clinicians: A scoping review

Author:

Pestian Teresa12,Awtrey Eli3ORCID,Kanov Jason4,Winick Naomi5,Thienprayoon Rachel26ORCID

Affiliation:

1. College of Education, Criminal Justice and Human Services University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio USA

2. Department of Anesthesia, College of Medicine University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio USA

3. Lindner College of Business University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio USA

4. College of Business and Economics Western Washington University Bellingham Washington USA

5. Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA

6. Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe unprecedented exodus of workers from the healthcare system is a patient safety crisis. Organizational compassion in health care is the proactive, systematic, and continuous identification, alleviation, and prevention of all sources of suffering.AimsThis scoping review aimed to describe the evidence regarding the impact of organizational compassion on clinicians, identify gaps, and provide recommendations for future research.MethodsA comprehensive librarian‐assisted database search was conducted. Databases searched were PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsychInfo, and Business Source Complete. Combinations of search terms regarding health care, compassion, organizational compassion, and workplace suffering were used. The search strategy was limited to English language articles and those published between 2000 and 2021.ResultsDatabase search yielded 781 articles. After removing duplicates, 468 were screened by title and abstract, and 313 were excluded. One‐hundred and fifty‐five underwent full‐text screening, and 137 were removed, leaving 18 eligible articles, two of which were set in the United States. Ten articles evaluated barriers or facilitators to organizational compassion, four evaluated elements of compassionate leadership, and four evaluated the Schwartz Center Rounds intervention. Several described the need to create systems that are compassionate to clinicians. Lack of time, support staff, and resources impeded the delivery of such interventions.Linking evidence to actionLittle research has been done to understand and evaluate the impact of compassion on US clinicians. Given the workforce crisis in American health care and the potential positive impact of increasing compassion for clinicians, there is an urgent need for researchers and healthcare administrators to fill this gap.

Funder

Cambia Health Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,General Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3