Evaluation of patient participation in relation to the implementation of a person‐centered nursing shift handover

Author:

Lantz Ann‐Christin Hultman1ORCID,Gunningberg Lena1ORCID,Eriksson Gunilla2ORCID,Eldh Ann Catrine13ORCID,Wenemark Marika34ORCID,Pöder Ulrika1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden

2. Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Occupational Therapy Karolinska Institutet Huddinge Sweden

3. Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences Linköping University Linköping Sweden

4. Unit of Public Health and Statistics, Region Östergötland Linköping Sweden

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIt has been suggested that nursing shift‐to‐shift handover should be a more team‐based dialogue with and for the patient rather than about a patient.AimThe aim of this study was to evaluate patient participation in relation to the implementation of the person‐centered handover (PCH).MethodA pretest–posttest design was used without a comparison group, including patients from nine units in a university hospital at pretest (n = 228) and after implementing PCH (posttest, n = 253) per the framework integrated‐Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services. The PCH is inspired by an Australian bedside handover model. The Patient Preferences for the Patient Participation tool was used to rate the preference for and experience of participation on 12 items, combined into three levels of preference‐based participation (insufficient–fair–sufficient).ResultsThere were no differences regarding experience or preference‐based participation between patients at pretest–posttest; however, posttest patients experienced participation in the item Reciprocal communication to a lesser extent than the pretest patients. Only 49% of the posttest group received PCH; of those not receiving PCH, some would have wanted PCH (27%), while some would have declined (24%). Patients receiving PCH had sufficient participation (82%), to a greater extent, regarding the item Sharing one's symptoms with staff than patients at pretest (72%). Patients receiving PCH also had sufficient participation, to a greater extent, than patients at posttest who did not receive, but would have wanted PCH, regarding four items: (1) sharing one's symptoms with staff, (2) reciprocal communication, (3) being told what was done, and (4) taking part in planning.Linking evidence to actionMost patients want to be present at PCH. Therefore, nurses should ask for the patients' preferences regarding PCH and act accordingly. Not inviting patients who want PCH could contribute to insufficient patient participation. Further studies are needed to capture what assistance nurses would want in identifying and acting in alignment with patient preferences.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,General Nursing

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3