Lead migration rate in dorsal root ganglion stimulation using lead anchoring techniques: A follow‐up study

Author:

Chapman Kenneth B.1234ORCID,Yousef Tariq1ORCID,Amireh Ahmad1,Kallewaard Jan Willem56ORCID,van Helmond Noud14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The Spine & Pain Institute of New York New York New York City USA

2. Department of Anesthesiology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health New York Manhasset USA

3. Department of Anesthesiology, New York University Langone Medical Center New York University New York New York City USA

4. Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center Radboud University Nijmegen The Netherlands

5. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Rijnstate Arnhem The Netherlands

6. Department of Anesthesiology Amsterdam University Medical Center Amsterdam The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundLead anchoring has previously been shown to reduce the rate of dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG‐S) lead migration. The aim of this study was to assess longer‐term follow‐up and consistency of lead migration prevention with lead anchoring in a new cohort of patients.MethodsWe performed a retrospective chart review from September 2017 to November 2022 of all patients who had DRG‐S implants at our institute to identify the number of lead migrations that occurred over this period. The first cohort consisted of patients reported on in a previous publication (implanted from September 2017 through September 2020) subdivided into unanchored or anchored lead groups. The second cohort consisted of patients implanted during or after October 2020 who were not previously reported on for whom leads were anchored using silastic anchoring only.ResultsAt the November 2022 data cutoff, in the initial cohort, 8 migrations had occurred in unanchored leads over an average follow‐up of 49 months, equating to a migration rate of 9.1% per lead. Patients with anchored leads in the initial cohort experienced 2 migrations over an average follow‐up of 38 months (0.7% migration rate per lead). There were no new lead migrations in these groups over the extended follow‐up reported here. The migration rate in the new cohort was similar, with 1 migration over an average follow‐up of 13 months (0.5% migration rate per lead).ConclusionThese results underscore the necessity of anchor placement during DRG‐S lead implantation to prevent lead migration.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3