Effectiveness, safety, and predictors of response to ultrasound‐guided stellate ganglion blockades for the treatment of patients with chronic migraine: A retrospective and observational study

Author:

Yu Bin1,Zhang Wei1,Zhao Chunmei2,Xing Yan1,Meng Lan2,Luo Fang2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Day Surgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China

2. Department of Pain Management, Beijing Tiantan Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundWhether ultrasound‐guided stellate ganglion block (SGB) is a valuable therapeutic option for the treatment of patients with chronic migraine (CM) is worth exploring. If SGB is proven to be effective for CM, the identification of potential predictors for the effectiveness of SGB warrants further investigation. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of SGB in patients with CM and to explore the predictive factors for its treatment effectiveness.MethodsThis is a retrospective observational study. We retrospectively analyzed the effects of SGB for the treatment of patients with CM under ultrasound guidance, between January 2018 and June 2022. The follow‐up time was approximately 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after the last SGBs. The response criterion was defined as a reduction in pain intensity of > 50% measured using the most severe numerical rating scale (NRS) score compared to pretreatment baseline, without an increase in the dose or the type of analgesic or anxiolytic/antidepressant medication, otherwise unresponsive to SGB. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify the predictive factors for SGB response.ResultsNinety‐seven patients were included in this study. SGB was effective in most of the CM patients, with an effective rate of 90.7%, 82.5%, and 71.1% after 1, 2, and 3 months of the last SGBs, respectively. At 3‐month follow‐up, 95.7% responsive patients benefited from repeated SGBs. In patients receiving repeated SGB treatments, the number of SGBs in responsive patients was significantly greater than those in patients with no response at 3‐month follow‐up (3.41 ± 1.31 vs. 2.68 ± 0.67, p = 0.02). Comorbid anxiety or depression was a negative predictor of SGB effectiveness at 3‐month follow‐up (B = −0.25, 95% CI −0.45 to −0.05, p = 0.01). The overall adverse events rate associated with ultrasound‐guided SGB was 9.3%. There were no serious complications; all adverse events were transient, with hoarseness being the most common adverse event.ConclusionsUltrasound‐guided SGB was an effective and safe treatment for CM patients. The majority of responsive patients with CM benefited from repeated SGBs. CM patients who needed repeated SGBs may obtain good and sustained analgesic effect after receiving a greater number of SGBs. Patients without comorbidities such as anxiety or depression were more likely to benefit from SGB treatments.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3