Interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation and sexual functioning: Treatment outcomes and patient preferences

Abstract

AbstractBackground/ObjectiveSexual dysfunction is common for patients experiencing chronic pain. Prior research is limited on how treatment for chronic pain affects patients' sexual functioning. This study reports pre‐/post‐treatment measures of self‐reported sexual functioning among individuals presenting for chronic pain treatment at an interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program (IPRP) and reports patient treatment preferences.MethodThis study uses detailed treatment measures across multiple domains of sexual functioning to describe the prevalence and correlates of self‐reported sexual functioning among individuals with chronic pain presenting for and discharging from treatment at an IPRP (N = 71). Domains include sexual interest, satisfaction with sexual functioning, vaginal lubrication, vaginal discomfort, and erectile function. Patients also completed a multiple‐choice treatment preferences questionnaire created for this study.ResultsResults from this study show a high prevalence of sexual dysfunction in chronic pain populations (51.5%) and show no significant difference in sexual functioning after completing outpatient treatment, except for a significant improvement in sexual satisfaction for males only. Results from the patient treatment preferences questionnaire indicate that most patients (83.3%) thought their pain was important to address within the context of an IPRP; however, many patients (58.7%) did not think their treatment addressed sexual functioning. In addition, many patients (34%) would prefer to discuss sexual functioning with their primary care provider or pelvic floor physical therapist.ConclusionFindings demonstrate that usual multidisciplinary pain management treatment is not sufficient to address patients' concerns with sexual functioning. Additional creative strategies will need to be studied on how to best treat these overlapping problems. Implications and future research directions are discussed.