Recipient and kidney graft outcomes of deceased donors with human immunodeficiency virus in the United States

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) act afforded transplantation of organs from donors who have HIV. Herein we compared the long‐term outcomes of recipients with HIV by donor HIV testing status.MethodsUsing the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified all primary adult kidney transplant recipients who were HIV‐positive between 1/1/16‐12/31/21. Recipients were grouped into three cohorts according to the donor HIV status based on antibody (Ab) and nucleic acid testing (NAT): Donor Ab−/NAT− (n = 810), Donor Ab+ /NAT− (n = 98), and Donor Ab+/NAT+ (n = 90). We compared recipient and death‐censored graft survival (DCGS) by donor HIV testing status using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression, censored at 3 years posttransplant. Secondary outcomes were delayed graft function (DGF) and the following 1‐year outcomes: acute rejection, re‐hospitalization, and serum creatinine.ResultsIn Kaplan–Meier analyses, patient survival and DCGS were similar by donor HIV status (log rank p = .667; log rank p = .388). DGF occurred more frequently in donors with HIV Ab−/NAT− testing compared with Ab+/NAT− or Ab+/NAT+ testing (38.0% vs. 28.6% vs. 26.7%, p = .028). Average dialysis time before transplant was twice as long for recipients who received organs from donors with Ab−/NAT− testing (p < .001). Acute rejection, re‐hospitalization and serum creatinine at 12 months did not differ between the groups.ConclusionsPatient and allograft survival for recipients living with HIV remains comparable irrespective of donor HIV testing status. Utilizing kidneys from deceased donors with HIV Ab+/NAT− or Ab+/NAT+ testing shortens dialysis time prior to transplant. image