Effects of animal position on M‐mode, two‐dimensional, and Doppler echocardiographic measurements in healthy French bulldogs

Abstract

AbstractEchocardiography is the most widely accepted diagnostic tool for assessment of cardiac function and morphology in dogs and is usually performed in lateral recumbency. However, in some situations or in stressed patients, it is necessary to perform it in a standing position. Only one study evaluated the effects of animal position on selected two‐dimensional and M‐mode echocardiographic variables in four healthy dogs of different breeds, but not in brachycephalic breeds. In these breeds echocardiographic evaluation is sometimes needed in standing position due to the severity of brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome and the impossibility of managing them in lateral recumbency without causing stress and choking danger. The objectives of this prospective, observational study were to (a) evaluate the effects of lateral recumbency versus standing positions on echocardiographic M‐mode, two‐dimensional, Doppler flow measurements, and Tissue Doppler imaging in healthy French bulldogs (FBs); (b) assess the intra‐ and interoperator variability of the standing echocardiographic examination; and (c) compare the obtained results with the available data from the literature. Forty healthy FBs (20 females/20 males) were sampled. The median age and weight were 2.45 years (IQR25–75, 1.18–4.16) and 12.7 kg (IQR25–75, 10.88–13.46). There were no differences between lateral recumbency and standing position measurements (P > 0.05). Intraoperator coefficients of variation (CVs) ranged from 0.5% to 10.1%, whereas interoperator CVs ranged from 1% to 14.2%. Only E wave peak velocity, aortic, and pulmonary flows were consistent with the previously published reference ranges in lateral recumbency. In conclusion, echocardiography in a standing position could be a useful tool in FBs.