Effect of cross‐polarization filters on the trueness of colors obtained with a single‐lens reflex camera, macro lens, and a ring flash

Author:

Yilmaz Burak123,Dede Doğu Ömür4ORCID,Diker Emre5ORCID,Fonseca Manrique1ORCID,Johnston William Michael3,Küçükekenci Ahmet Serkan4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, School of Dental Medicine University of Bern Bern Switzerland

2. Department of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine University of Bern Bern Switzerland

3. Division of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry The Ohio State University College of Dentistry Columbus Ohio USA

4. Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry Ordu University Ordu Turkey

5. Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry Ankara University Ankara Turkey

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo investigate the effect of cross‐polarization filters on the colors of shade tabs obtained with a digital single‐lens reflex (DSLR) camera, macrolens, and a ring flash.Materials and MethodsDigital images of four shade tables (1M1, 3L2.5, 3R2.5, and 5M3) from the VITA Toothguide 3D‐Master shade guide were taken using a DSLR camera, 100 mm macrolens, and ring flash with two different cross‐polarizing filters (Polar_eyes and Filtropolar), and without (Nonpolarizer; n = 7). The CIE L*a*b* color coordinates of digital images were calculated and remeasured with a spectroradiometer (SR). The color differences (ΔE00) between the SR and digital images were calculated and analyzed with the two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD test (α = 0.05).ResultsΔE00 values of all test groups were higher than the clinically acceptable threshold (∆E00 > 1.80). While the ∆E00 values of Filtropolar (6.19 ± 0.44) and Polar_eyes (7.82 ± 0.23) groups were significantly higher than the Nonpolarizer (4.69 ± 0.32) for the 1M1 shade tab, ∆E00 value of Polar_eyes (6.23 ± 0.34) was significantly lower than Nonpolarizer (10.71 ± 0.48) group for 5M3 shade tab (p < 0.05).ConclusionThe color‐matching results of tested digital photography techniques with and without cross‐polarization were unacceptable, compared to a spectroradiometer. While digital photography with Polar_eyes cross‐polarizing filter has closer results to the reference device for the low‐in‐value shade table (5M3), for the high‐in‐value shade table (1M1), improved results were obtained without a cross‐polarizing filter.Clinical SignificanceThe cross‐polarization filters are increasingly used in dentistry for tooth color communication with digital photography techniques. However, the digital photography techniques with‐without cross‐polarization filterers should be improved to obtain clinically acceptable color‐matching results.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Dentistry

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3