Vital signs and medical emergency response (MER) activation predict in‐hospital mortality in general surgery patients: a study of 15 969 admissions

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe applicability of the vital signs prompting medical emergency response (MER) activation has not previously been examined specifically in a large general surgical cohort. This study aimed to characterize the distribution, and predictive performance, of four vital signs selected based on Australian guidelines (oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure and heart rate); with those of the MER activation criteria.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted including patients admitted under general surgical services of two hospitals in South Australia over 2 years. Likelihood ratios for patients meeting MER activation criteria, or a vital sign in the most extreme 1% for general surgery inpatients (<0.5th percentile or > 99.5th percentile), were calculated to predict in‐hospital mortality.Results15 969 inpatient admissions were included comprising 2 254 617 total vital sign observations. The 0.5th and 99.5th centile for heart rate was 48 and 133, systolic blood pressure 85 and 184, respiratory rate 10 and 31, and oxygen saturations 89% and 100%, respectively. MER activation criteria with the highest positive likelihood ratio for in‐hospital mortality were heart rate ≤ 39 (37.65, 95% CI 27.71–49.51), respiratory rate ≥ 31 (15.79, 95% CI 12.82–19.07), and respiratory rate ≤ 7 (10.53, 95% CI 6.79–14.84). These MER activation criteria likelihood ratios were similar to those derived when applying a threshold of the most extreme 1% of vital signs.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that vital signs within Australian guidelines, and escalation to MER activation, appropriately predict in‐hospital mortality in a large cohort of patients admitted to general surgical services in South Australia.