Efficacy of topical agents in oral mucositis prevention: Systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Author:

Coppini Martina12,Caponio Vito Carlo Alberto3ORCID,Mauceri Rodolfo14ORCID,Bizzoca Maria Eleonora3,Laino Luigi5,Lorenzo‐Pouso Alejandro I.6ORCID,Russo Diana5,Troiano Giuseppe3ORCID,Silva Fábio França Vieira E.67,Lo Muzio Lorenzo3ORCID,Campisi Giuseppina4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care University of Palermo Palermo Italy

2. Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging University of Messina Messina Italy

3. Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine University of Foggia Foggia Italy

4. Unit of Oral Medicine and Dentistry for Fragile Patients, Department of Rehabilitation, Fragility and Continuity of Care University Hospital Palermo Palermo Italy

5. Multidisciplinary Department of Medical‐Surgical and Odontostomatological Specialties University of Campania, “Luigi Vanvitelli” Naples Italy

6. Oral Medicine, Oral Surgery and Implantology Unit (MedOralRes), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry University of Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain

7. ORALRES Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (FIDIS) Santiago de Compostela Spain

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundOral mucositis (OM) is considered one of the most common side effects of patients undergoing cancer therapy. OM prevention plays a crucial role in the effectiveness of cancer treatment and the patient's quality of life. Different preventive treatments have been proposed in clinical trials, however with inconclusive results.Materials and MethodsA systematic review search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database to answer the PICO question: in cancer patients, do specific topical agents compared to standard treatments or placebo reduce the onset and severity of oral mucositis? The risk of bias was assessed, and a network meta‐analysis was conducted.ResultsOf 2913 results, 30 randomized clinical trials were considered suitable for inclusion. A total of 2564 patients were analyzed, of which 1284 belonged to the test group and 1280 belonged to the control group. Natural products were the most used, followed mainly by antimicrobial agents, coating agents, and basic oral care measures. Topical sucralfate resulted in the most powerful intervention for the OM prevention (OR = 0.04, 95%C.I. = 0.01–0.25, p‐value = 0.001).ConclusionDue to its cytoprotective action, low cost, ease of administration, and safety, sucralfate could become a potential ally to prevent the onset of OM during cancer therapy.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3