High‐density mapping for ablation of atypical atrial flutters – procedural characteristics related to outcome

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundHigh‐density (HD) mapping is increasingly used to characterize arrhythmic substrate for ablation of atypical atrial flutters (AAFl). However, results on clinical outcomes and factors that are associated with arrhythmia recurrence are scarce.MethodsSingle‐center, prospective, observational cohort study that enrolled patients with catheter ablation for AAFl using a HD mapping system and a grid‐shaped mapping catheter. Procedural characteristics, rates of atrial flutter recurrence, and factors that were associated with atrial flutter recurrence were evaluated.ResultsSixty‐one patients with a total of 94 AAFl were included in the cohort. HD mapping was used to successfully identify the flutter circuit of 80/94 AAFl. The circuit was not identified for 14/94 AAFl in 11 patients. Critical isthmuses were identified and ablated in 29 patients (48%). Acute procedural success was achieved in 52 patients (85%), and 37 patients (61%) remained free from atrial flutter recurrence during a follow up of 1.3 [1.0–2.1] years. Atrial flutter recurrence was univariably associated with presence of a non‐identified flutter circuit (HR:2.6 95% CI [1.1–6.3], p = .04) and critical isthmus‐targeted ablation (HR:0.4 [0.15–0.90], p = .03). In multivariable regression analyses, critical isthmus ablation remained significant (HR:0.4 [0.16–0.97], p = .04), whereas presence of a non‐identified flutter did not (HR:2.4 [0.96–5.8], p = .06).ConclusionHD mapping was successfully used to identify the majority of AAFl circuits. Ablation resulted in freedom from atrial flutter recurrence in 61% of the cohort. Successful identification of all flutter circuits and critical isthmuses appears to be beneficial for long‐term outcomes.