Development and modification of a dysphagia question prompt list to improve patient‐physician communication: Incorporating both esophageal expert and patient perspectives

Author:

Achalu Sudharshan1,Berry Rani1ORCID,Zhuo Justin1ORCID,Bredenoord Albert J.2ORCID,Clarke John O.1ORCID,Fass Ronnie3ORCID,Gyawali C. Prakash4ORCID,Kahrilas Peter J.5ORCID,Katzka David A.6ORCID,Massey Benson T.7ORCID,Penagini Roberto8ORCID,Roman Sabine9ORCID,Savarino Edoardo10ORCID,Vela Marcelo F.11ORCID,Kamal Afrin N.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Stanford University School of Medicine Redwood City California USA

2. Division of Neurogastroenterology and Motility Amsterdam University Medical Center Amsterdam The Netherlands

3. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology MetroHealth Cleveland Ohio USA

4. Division of Gastroenterology Washington University in St. Louis St. Louis Missouri USA

5. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA

6. Division of Gastroenterology Columbia University New York New York USA

7. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee Wisconsin USA

8. Division of Gastroenterology Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico and University of Milan Milan Italy

9. Division of Digestive Physiology Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lyon Lyon France

10. Division of Gastroenterology University of Padua Padua Italy

11. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Mayo Clinic Arizona Scottsdale Arizona USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundQuestion prompt lists (QPLs) are structured sets of disease‐specific questions, intended to encourage question‐asking by patients and enhance patient‐physician communication. To date, a dysphagia‐specific QPL has not been developed for patients with esophageal dysphagia symptoms. We aim to develop a dysphagia‐specific QPL incorporating both esophageal expert and patient perspectives, applying rigorous methodology.MethodsThe QPL content was generated applying a two‐round modified Delphi (RAND/UCLA) method among 11 experts. In round one, experts provided five answers to the prompts: “What general questions should patients ask when being seen for dysphagia?” and “What questions do I not hear patients asking but, given my experience, I believe they should be asking?” In round two, experts rated proposed questions on a 5‐point Likert scale. Responses rated as “essential” or “important”, determined by an a priori median threshold of ≥4.0, were accepted for inclusion. Subsequently, 20 patients from Stanford Health Care were enrolled to modify the preliminary QPL, to incorporate their perspectives and opinions. Patients independently rated questions applying the same 5‐point Likert scale. At the end, patients were encouraged to propose additional questions to incorporate into the QPL by open‐endedly asking “Are there questions we didn't ask, that you think we should?”Key ResultsEleven experts participated in both voting rounds. Of 85 questions generated from round one, 60 (70.6%) were accepted for inclusion, meeting a median value of ≥4.0. Questions were combined to reduce redundancy, narrowing down to 44 questions. Questions were categorized into the following six themes: 1. “What is causing my dysphagia?”; 2. “Associated symptoms”; 3. “Testing for dysphagia”; 4. “Lifestyle modifications”; 5. “Treatment for dysphagia”; and 6. “Prognosis”. The largest number of questions covered “What is causing my dysphagia” (27.3%). Twenty patients participated and modified the QPL. Of the 44 questions experts agreed were important, only 30 questions (68.2%) were accepted for inclusion. Six patients proposed 10 additional questions and after incorporating the suggested questions, the final dysphagia‐specific QPL created by esophageal experts and modified by patients consisted of 40 questions.Conclusions & InferencesIncorporating expert and patient perspectives, we developed a dysphagia‐specific QPL to enhance patient‐physician communication. Our study highlights importance of incorporating patient perspective when developing such a communication tool. Further studies will measure the impact of this communication tool on patient engagement.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Gastroenterology,Endocrine and Autonomic Systems,Physiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3