Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of adjunctive lacosamide in pediatric patients with epilepsy syndromes associated with generalized seizures: Phase 2, open‐label exploratory trial

Author:

Auvin Stéphane123ORCID,Arzimanoglou Alexis45ORCID,Beller Cynthia6ORCID,Floricel Florin7,Daniels Tony6,Bozorg Ali6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Université Paris‐Cité, INSERM NeuroDiderot Paris France

2. Pediatric Neurology Department APHP, Robert Debré University Hospital, ERN EpiCARE member Paris France

3. Institut Universitaire de France (IUF) Paris France

4. Paediatric Clinical Epileptology and Neurophysiology Department, ERN EpiCARE member University Hospitals of Lyon (HCL) Lyon France

5. Epilepsy Research Unit, San Juan de Dios Children's Hospital ERN EpiCARE member Barcelona Spain

6. UCB Pharma Morrisville North Carolina USA

7. UCB Pharma Monheim am Rhein Germany

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of lacosamide (LCM) (up to 12 mg/kg/day or 600 mg/day) as adjunctive therapy in pediatric patients with epilepsy syndromes associated with generalized seizures.MethodsPhase 2, multicenter, open‐label exploratory trial (SP0966; NCT01969851; 2012‐001446‐18) of oral LCM for epilepsy syndromes associated with generalized seizures in pediatric patients ≥1 month to <18 years of age taking one to three concomitant antiseizure medications. The trial comprised a 6‐week prospective baseline period, 6‐week flexible titration period, and 12‐week maintenance period.ResultsFifty‐five patients (mean age: 9.2 years; 56.4% male) took at least one dose of LCM and had at least one post‐baseline efficacy‐related assessment. The median treatment duration was 127.0 days. There were no clinically significant mean or median changes or worsening from baseline to end of the titration period in the count of generalized spike–wave discharges per interpretable hour on 24‐h ambulatory electroencephalogram recordings, or from baseline to the maintenance period in mean and median days with any generalized or focal to bilateral tonic–clonic seizures per 28 days. Treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 49 patients (89.1%), and three patients (5.5%) discontinued due to TEAEs. The median change and median percentage change in days with any generalized or focal to bilateral tonic–clonic seizures per 28 days from baseline to the maintenance period were both 0. Trends toward improvement (decrease) were observed in median change and median percentage change in days with each individual seizure type (absence, myoclonic, clonic, tonic, tonic–clonic, atonic, and focal to bilateral tonic–clonic) per 28 days.SignificanceSafety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of LCM and were as expected for the pediatric population. There was no worsening of generalized seizures with LCM. Limitations include the inability to correlate spike and wave data with clinical outcomes, and the lack of similar studies against which the results can be compared.

Funder

UCB Pharma

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3