How well are we collecting umbilical cord lactate and gas samples?

Author:

Bui Trang Minh1ORCID,Battin Malcolm2ORCID,Sadler Lynn1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Women's Health, National Women's Health Te Toka Tumai, Auckland City Hospital Auckland New Zealand

2. Department of Neonatology Te Toka Tumai, Auckland City Hospital Auckland New Zealand

Abstract

AimsThe aim of this study is to measure staff compliance with the local umbilical cord lactate (UCL) sampling guideline and investigate the quality of paired UCG samples at a tertiary maternity unit.MethodsWe performed a retrospective consecutive sampling of 100 babies delivered via emergency caesarean section and 50 babies with each of all other guideline‐based indications for UCL sampling born on and before 31 December 2021. Data were extracted from physical and electronic records. Compliance with guideline‐based indications for UCL at birth was measured. The proportion of valid UCG samples was calculated. Samples were considered invalid under the following cases: (i) inadvertently collecting from the same vessel, (ii) switching arterial and venous samples, (iii) collecting from only one vessel or (iv) committing errors during sample collection and handling.ResultsOf the samples collected at birth from 321 babies, 280 (87%) had UCL. Small for gestational age and concerns about fetal well‐being in labour were indications associated with poorer compliance, 66% and 78%, respectively. About 99 (44%) babies of 226 babies with UCG performed had valid UCG samples. The most common reasons for invalid samples were collection and handling errors (22%) and inadvertent collection from the same vessel (15%).ConclusionsGenerally, compliance with the guidelines is good. However, invalid UCG samples were more frequent than expected.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine

Reference19 articles.

1. Strength of association between umbilical cord pH and perinatal and long term outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis

2. A comparison of criteria for defining metabolic acidemia in live-born neonates and its effect on predicting serious adverse neonatal outcomes

3. Use of umbilical cord blood gas analysis in the assessment of the newborn

4. National Women's Health Auckland District Health Board.Intrapartum fetal surveillance policy[Internet].2017. [Accessed 14 June 2023.] Available from URL:https://www.nationalwomenshealth.adhb.govt.nz/assets/Womens‐health/Documents/Policies‐and‐guidelines/Fetal‐Surveillance‐Policy‐.pdf.

5. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.Intrapartum fetal surveillance clinical guideline[Internet].2019. [Accessed 14 June 2023.] Available from URL:https://fsep.ranzcog.edu.au/FSEP/media/FSEP/IFS%20Clinical%20Guideline/FINAL‐RANZCOG‐IFS‐Clinical‐Guideline‐2019.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3