Quality‐of‐life outcomes of the ROBOtic‐assisted versus Conventional Open Partial nephrectomy (ROBOCOP) II trial

Author:

Sidoti Abate Marie Angela1,Menold Hanna Saskia1,Neuberger Manuel1,Kirchner Marietta2,Haney Caelan Max345,Nuhn Philipp16,Westhoff Niklas1,Honeck Patrick1,Michel Maurice‐Stephan1,Kriegmair Maximilian Christian17,Kowalewski Karl‐Friedrich134

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim University of Heidelberg Mannheim Germany

2. Institute of Medical Biometry University of Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany

3. Division of Intelligent Systems and Robotics in Urology (ISRU) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany

4. DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Germany Heidelberg Germany

5. Department of Urology University of Leipzig Leipzig Germany

6. Department of Urology CAU and UKSH Kiel Kiel Germany

7. Department of Urology Munich‐Planegg Planegg Germany

Abstract

ObjectivesTo comprehensively compare quality‐of‐life (QoL) outcomes between open partial nephrectomy (OPN) and robot‐assisted PN (RAPN) from the randomised ROBOtic‐assisted versus Conventional Open Partial nephrectomy (ROBOCOP) II trial, as QoL data comparing OPN and RAPN are virtually non‐existent, especially not from randomised controlled trials (RCTs).Patients and MethodsThe ROBOCOP II was a single‐centre, open‐label RCT between OPN and RAPN. The pre‐planned analyses of QoL outcomes are presented. Data were analysed descriptively in a modified intention‐to‐treat population.ResultsA total of 50 patients underwent surgery. At postoperative Day 90 (POD90), there was no significant difference for the Kidney Disease Quality of Life‐Short Form questionnaire score (mean [sd] OPN 72 [20] vs RAPN 76 [15], P = 0.850), while there were advantages for RAPN in the subdomains of ‘Pain’ (P = 0.006) and ‘Physical functioning’ (P = 0.011) immediately after surgery. For the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire 30‐item core there were overall advantages directly after surgery (mean [sd] score OPN 63 [20] vs RAPN 75 [17], P = 0.031), as well as for the subdomains ‘Fatigue’ (P = 0.026), ‘Pain’ (P = 0.002) and ‘Constipation’ (P = 0.045) but no differences at POD90. There were no differences for the EuroQoL five Dimensions five Levels questionnaire at POD90 (mean [sd] score OPN 70 [22] vs RAPN 72 [17], P = 1.0) or at any other time point. Finally, no significant differences were found for the overall Convalescence and Recovery Evaluation questionnaire score at POD90 (mean [sd] OPN 84 [13] vs RAPN 86 [10], P = 0.818) but less pain in the RAPN group (P = 0.017) directly after surgery.ConclusionsPain and physical functioning as subdomains of QoL are improved after RAPN compared to OPN in the early postoperative course, while there are no differences anymore after 3 months.

Funder

Dietmar Hopp Stiftung

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3