Bovine‐originated xenografts versus synthetic bone grafting materials in lateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract

AbstractAimsThis study aimed to systematically compare the patients undergoing lateral MSFA therapies utilizing bovine‐originated xenografts versus varied synthetic bone grafting materials.MethodsPubmed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched up to April 2023, compensated by a manual search in selected journals. Studies reporting histological outcomes (residual bone graft, newly formed bone, non‐mineralized tissue) and clinical outcomes (implant survival, ISQ value) were included. Several analyses were performed, including meta‐analysis, sensitivity study, and Egger's regression tests.ResultsSixteen clinical/randomized control trials were included in this systematic review, among which 12 were enrolled in a meta‐analysis. The percentage of newly formed bone within the grafted sinuses by hybrid HA/TCP was significantly higher than those by xenografts (WMD 2.85, 95%CI [0.72; 4.99]), but those grafted by pure HA (WMD −1.72, 95%CI [−3.15; −0.29]) or TCP (WMD −7.10, 95%CI [−13.02; −1.17]) were significantly lower than xenograft counterparts. The residual bone graft and non‐mineralized tissue yielded by synthetic HA, TCP, and HA/TCP showed no significant differences with the xenograft group.ConclusionThe chemistry of grafted bone substitutes in lateral MSFA influenced the quantity of newly formed bone. Those grafted with hybrid HA/TCP yielded the highest amount of new bone compared to bovine‐originated HA. However, this influence was not significant on residual bone graft and non‐mineralized tissue.