Listen to me, I really am sick! Patient and family narratives of clinical deterioration before and during rapid response system intervention

Author:

Bucknall Tracey K.123ORCID,Guinane Jessica1,McCormack Brendan45,Jones Daryl6789,Buist Michael10,Hutchinson Alison M.1311ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing & Midwifery, Deakin University Geelong Victoria Australia

2. Alfred Health Melbourne Victoria Australia

3. Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University Geelong Victoria Australia

4. Division of Nursing, Paramedic Science Occupational Therapy and Arts Therapies, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh UK

5. Faculty of Medicine and Health, The Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

6. Austin Health Melbourne Victoria Australia

7. Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia

8. Department of Surgery University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

9. Department of Critical Care University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

10. School of Medicine University of Tasmania Tasmania Australia

11. Barwon Health Geelong Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractAimTo explore patient and family narratives about their recognition and response to clinical deterioration and their interactions with clinicians prior to and during Medical Emergency Team (MET) activations in hospital.BackgroundResearch on clinical deterioration has mostly focused on clinicians' roles. Although patients and families can identify subtle cues of early deterioration, little research has focused on their experience of recognising, speaking up and communicating with clinicians during this period of instability.DesignA narrative inquiry.MethodsUsing narrative interviewing techniques, 33 adult patients and 14 family members of patients, who had received a MET call, in one private and one public academic teaching hospital in Melbourne, Australia were interviewed. Narrative analysis was conducted on the data.ResultsThe core story of help seeking for recognition and response by clinicians to patient deterioration yielded four subplots: (1) identifying deterioration, recognition that something was not right and different from earlier; (2) voicing concerns to their nurse or by family members on their behalf; (3) being heard, desiring a response acknowledging the legitimacy of their concerns; and (4) once concerns were expressed, there was an expectation of and trust in clinicians to act on the concerns and manage the situation.ConclusionClinical deterioration results in an additional burden for hospitalised patients and families to speak up, seek help and resolve their concerns. Educating patients and families on what to be concerned about and when to notify staff requires a close partnership with clinicians.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareClinicians must create an environment that enables patients and families to speak up. They must be alert to both subjective and objective information, to acknowledge and to act on the information accordingly.Reporting MethodThe consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) guidelines were used for reporting.Patient or Public ContributionThe consumer researcher was involved in design, data analysis and publication preparation.

Funder

Austin Health

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care

Australian Research Council

Queen Margaret University

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3