Interparental conflict trajectories across various child residence arrangements when parents live apart

Author:

Holt Tonje1ORCID,Helland Maren Sand1ORCID,Larsen Linda1ORCID,Gustavson Kristin23ORCID,Smyth Bruce4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Childhood and Families Norwegian Institute of Public Health Oslo Norway

2. Department of Psychology University of Oslo Oslo Norway

3. Department of Mental Disorders Norwegian Institute of Public Health Oslo Norway

4. Centre for Social Research and Methods Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia

Abstract

AbstractIn Norway, as in most Western countries, a growing proportion of parents living apart choose shared residence for their children. The aim of this study was to investigate trajectories of five interparental conflict dimensions across four child residence arrangement groups (and three combination groups) to improve understanding of different conflict trajectories when parents live apart. We used data from the Dynamics of Family Conflict study. Families (N = 1136) were recruited from 37 family counseling centers across Norway. Parents answered questionnaires in three waves: Wave 1 (December 2017 through August 2019); Wave 2 (November 2019 through January 2021); and Wave 3 (April through May 2021). Mixed effects analyses indicated that (a) for all conflict dimensions, there was less conflict and more cooperation over time across all residence arrangements; (b) except for children's involvement in conflict, the conflict dimensions did not develop differently over time between residence arrangements; (c) families with arrangements in which one parent had minority time (1%–14% and 15%–34%) were more likely to report children being involved in their parents' arguments over time than the 35%–49% and 50/50 residence groups; (d) for families with high relational risk pattern, children's involvement in conflict did not decline in either a high (1–34%) or a low degree (35%–49%) of sharing; and (e) families with a violent risk pattern and low degree of sharing (1%–34%) had the steepest decrease in conflict frequency/intensity over time. Even with an average decrease in destructive conflict dimensions over time, the findings point to the need for providing support for parents with complex needs, particularly for parents with a high relational risk pattern.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference49 articles.

1. Defining High Conflict

2. Bates D. Maechler M. Bolker B. &Walker S.(2014).LME4: Linear mixed‐effects models using Eigen and S4. R Package Version 1.1‐4.https://cran.r‐project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html

3. A Meta-analysis of Parental Satisfaction, Adjustment, and Conflict in Joint Custody and Sole Custody Following Divorce

4. effectsize: Estimation of Effect Size Indices and Standardized Parameters

5. Child fatality or serious injury through maltreatment: Making sense of outcomes

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3