Challenging the formality bias: The organization of informal work, working relations, and collective agency in Kenya and Tanzania

Author:

Riisgaard Lone1ORCID,Torm Nina2ORCID,Kinyondo Godbertha3,Mitullah Winnie4,Kamau Anne4,Gervas Aloyce5,Indimuli Raphael4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Society and Business at Roskilde University Denmark

2. Roskilde University Denmark

3. Mzumbe University Dar es Salaam Tanzania

4. University of Nairobi Kenya

5. Mzumbe University Morogoro Tanzania

Abstract

AbstractMotivationFormal social protection systems, such as health insurance and representation, are often biased in favour of formal workers, thereby excluding most of the world's working population who make a living in the informal economy.PurposeThe article extends existing critiques of formality bias by investigating the reality of work for people in the informal economy in Kenya and Tanzania and analysing related social protection challenges. Specifically, we look at: (1) the governance of work; (2) the organization of work relations; and (3) collective agency. In terms of social protection, we focus on formal and informal forms of social insurance and representation.Methods and approachWe draw on interview and survey data from people working in micro trading, transport, and construction in Nairobi and Kisumu in Kenya, and Dar es Salaam and Dodoma in Tanzania. A total of 1,462 workers were surveyed and 24 focus group discussions were held with such workers. Interviews were conducted with 120 key informants: leaders and members of informal workers' associations in the three sectors, as well as representatives of authorities, trade unions, and business associations. Data were collected from June 2018 to December 2019.FindingsFormal social insurance and representation do not fit the real experience of most people working in the informal economy. They have been modelled on and designed to support workers in formal standard employment relations. At the same time, informal workers' associations play important roles in meeting—albeit inadequately—the social insurance and representational needs of their members.Policy implicationsMeaningful engagement with the reality of work and collective agency in the informal economy is necessary to inform more appropriate policies and measures to provide informal workers with appropriate social protection measures, particularly social insurance and representation. Their reality should not have to conform to an inadequate model; rather, the model should fit their reality.

Funder

Udenrigsministeriet

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Development,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference60 articles.

1. Babere N. J.(2013).Struggle for space: Appropriation and regulation of prime locations in sustaining informal livelihoods in Dar es Salaam city[Doctoral thesis Newcastle University]. Newcastle University Theses.https://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/2156

2. The global governance of informal economies: the International Labour Organization in East Africa

3. Labour conflicts in the Global South: an introduction

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3