Comparison of morbidity‐related parameters between autologous and allogeneic bone grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation from patients' perspective—A questionnaire‐based cohort study

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionAlveolar ridge augmentation is often required before dental implant placement. In this context, autologous bone grafts are considered the biological gold standard. Still, bone block harvesting is accompanied by some serious potential disadvantages and possible complications, such as pain, bleeding, and nerve irritation. Several studies aimed to compare autologous to allogeneic bone grafts concerning bone quality and implant survival rates; this is the first prospective study analyzing and comparing morbidity‐related parameters after alveolar ridge augmentation using autogenous and allogeneic bone blocks from patients' perspective.MethodsUsing a questionnaire, 36 patients were asked to evaluate the surgery as well as the post‐operative period concerning pain, stress, sensibility deficits, satisfaction with, and consequences from the surgery as well as the preferred procedure for future alveolar ridge augmentations.ResultsNo significant differences were shown regarding stress and pain during and after surgery, whereas the rate of nerve irritations was twice as high in the autologous group. The swelling was significantly higher in patients with autologous bone blocks (p = 0.001). Nevertheless, the overall satisfaction of patients of both groups was very high, with over 8/10 points.ConclusionsThe swelling was the main reason for patients' discomfort in both groups and was significantly higher after autologous bone augmentation. Since this side effect seems to be a highly relevant factor for patients' comfort and satisfaction, it needs to be discussed during preoperative consultation to allow shared decision‐making considering the anticipated morbidity.