Understanding immune‐mediated titanium allergy to in situ orthopaedic implants: a narrative review of the current literature

Author:

Chen Arnold1,Kurmis Andrew P.234ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Medicine University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia

2. Discipline of Medical Specialties University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia

3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Lyell McEwin Hospital Elizabeth Vale South Australia Australia

4. College of Medicine & Public Health Flinders University Bedford Park South Australia Australia

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionClinical recognition of potential immune‐mediated allergic responses to implanted metal devices is increasing. For orthopaedic implants, while ‘pure’ compounds are used in specific circumstances, the majority of components are alloys – a combination of two or more distinct metals. Titanium is found commonly in many orthopaedic devices and is often championed as a ‘hypoallergenic’ option or inclusion. In the absence of a relevant previously published summary on the topic, this paper explores the current state‐of‐understanding of titanium allergy and proposes a patient management algorithm whereby such immune reactions are clinically‐suggested.MethodsA structured, systematic literature review was performed following PRISMA search principles to provide a contemporary summary‐of‐understanding in this area and to highlight clinical and knowledge deficiencies.ResultsThirty‐five topic‐related articles were identified, the majority reflecting small case series' or proof‐of‐concept studies. The general standard of scientific evidence available was poor. Justification for arthroplasty utilization of titanium as a ‘hypoallergenic’ option is largely extrapolated from non‐orthopaedic domains.ConclusionsBoth ionic and conjugated titanium particles released from implant surfaces have the potential to trigger innate immune responses and true allergy. There exists no simple, high‐sensitivity, screening test for titanium allergy. Conventional skin‐patch testing is unreliable due to poor dermal penetration. Given established lymphocyte and macrophage activation pathways for allergy responses, in vitro methods using both cell‐types show diagnostic promise. Surgical biopsy analysis from host‐implant interfaces remains the contemporary ‘gold‐standard’, however this represents an invasive, costly and highly‐specialized approach not readily available in most settings. Further research to establish reliable/accessible diagnostic methods are indicated.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference39 articles.

1. Exploring the incidence, implications, and relevance of metal allergy to Orthopaedic surgeons;Haddad SF;J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev.,2019

2. Hip Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty:2022 Annual Report. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR).2022. Available from URL:https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2022.

3. Frank Stinchfield Award: Identification of the At-risk Genotype for Development of Pseudotumors Around Metal-on-metal THAs

4. Identification of protective and ‘at risk’ HLA genotypes for the development of pseudotumours around metal‐on‐metal hip resurfacings;Sheridan GA;Bone Joint J,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3