Author:
Bale Tim,Bergman Torbjörn
Abstract
AbstractRecent years have seen the institutionalization of minority governance in Sweden and New Zealand. Large, historic social democratic labour parties enjoy comparative security of tenure thanks to smaller, newer parties with whom they have signed long-term, detailed support agreements covering both policy and process. This trend toward ‘contract parliamentarism’ owes much to party-system dynamics, but also to the accretion of experience, to cultural norms and to institutional constraints – all of which, along with electoral contingency, explain why the trend has gone slightly further in one polity than in the other. While the trend seems to favour the left in general, its implications for the support or ‘servant’ parties, and – more normatively – for democracy itself, may be less favourable.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference35 articles.
1. Full text of the agreements is available at http://www.beehive.govt.nz/Documents/Files/NZFirst.pdf and http://www.beehive.govt.nz/Documents/Files/United.pdf.
2. Public images of political parties: A necessary evil?
3. See New Zealand Cabinet Office Circular NZ CO (02) 11, 3 September 2002, which is helpfully available on the web at http://www.dpmc.govt.nz/cabinet/circulars/co02/COC_02_11.pdf
4. Coordination problem and grand coalition: the puzzle of the government formation game in the Czech Republic, 1998☆
5. Cinderella and her ugly sisters: the mainstream and extreme right in Europe's bipolarising party systems
Cited by
90 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献