Abstract
AbstractThe analysis of armed conflict in the post Cold War era has been profoundly influenced by neoclassical economists. Statistical approaches have generated important propositions, but there is a danger when these feed into policy prescriptions. This paper first compares the economics of civil war literature with the social movement literature which has also tried to explain collective action problems. It argues that the latter has a much more sophisticated set of conceptual tools, enriched by empirical study. The paper then uses the case of multipolar militarization in oil-rich Casanare, Colombia, to demonstrate complexity and contingency in civil war trajectories. State policy failure and civil actors can be an important source of explanation alongside the economic agendas of armed actors.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference6 articles.
1. Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War
2. A Question of Economics: Is it Colonising the Social Sciences?;Fine;Economy and Society,1999
3. The Political Economy of the Resource Curse
4. Parasites and Predators: Guerillas and the Insurrection Economy of Colombia;Rangel;Journal of International Affairs,2000
5. Homo Economicus Goes to War: Methodological Individualism, Rational Choice and the Political Economy of War
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献