Abstract
AbstractThe effects of old and new media on governing and executive leadership have remained curiously under-studied. In the available literature, assessments prevail that consider the media to have developed a strongly power-enhancing effect on incumbent chief executives. A careful reconsideration of mass media effects on the conditions and manifestations of political leadership by presidents and prime ministers in different contemporary democracies suggests that the media more often function as effective constraints on leaders and leadership. Overall, the constraining effects of the traditional media have been more substantial than those generated by the new media. While there are obvious cross-national trends in the development of government–mass media relations, important differences between countries persist, which can be explained to some considerable extent by the different institutional features of contemporary democracies.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference78 articles.
1. Thomas C. Baylis, Governing by Committee: Collegial Leadership in Advanced Societies, Albany, State University of New York Press, 1989, p. 147.
2. On the Challenges of Cross-National Comparative Media Research
3. For a concise overview of different approaches see Anthony King, ‘Do Leaders' Personalities Really Matter?’, in Anthony King (ed.), Leaders' Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 1–44.
4. From Semi-presidentialism to Parliamentary Government: Political and Constitutional Developments in Finland
5. The Changing Parameters of Political Control in Western Europe;Helms;Parliamentary Affairs,2006
Cited by
45 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献