Immune responses to citrullinated and homocitrullinated peptides in healthy donors are not restricted to the HLA SE shared allele and can be selected into the memory pool

Abstract

AbstractCitrullination and homocitrullination are stress induced post‐translational modifications (siPTMs) which can be recognized by T cells. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from healthy donors and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients were stimulated with nine siPTM‐peptides. CD45RA/CD45RO depletion was employed to determine if peptide‐specific responses are naïve or memory. Human leucocyte antigen (HLA)‐DP4 and HLA‐DR4 transgenic mice were immunized with siPTM‐peptides and immune responses were determined with ex vivo ELISpot assays. The majority (24 out of 25) of healthy donors showed CD4 T cell‐specific proliferation to at least 1 siPTM‐peptide, 19 to 2 siPTM‐peptides, 14 to 3 siPTM‐peptides, 9 to 4 siPTM‐peptides, 6 to 5 siPTM‐peptides and 4 to 6 siPTM‐peptides. More donors responded to Vim28‐49cit (68%) and Bip189‐208cit (75%) compared with Vim415‐433cit (33%). In RA patients, the presentation of citrullinated epitopes is associated with HLA‐SE alleles; however, we witnessed responses in healthy donors who did not express the SE allele. The majority of responding T cells were effector memory cells with a Th1/cytotoxic phenotype. Responses to Vim28‐49cit and Eno241‐260cit originated in the memory pool, while the response to Vim415‐433cit was naïve. In the HLA‐DP4 and HLA‐DR4 transgenic models, Vim28cit generated a memory response. Peptide‐specific T cells were capable of Epstein–Barr virus transformed lymphoblastoid cell line recognition suggesting a link with stress due to infection. These results suggest siPTM‐peptides are presented under conditions of cellular stress and inflammation and drive cytotoxic CD4 T cell responses that aid in the removal of stressed cells. The presentation of such siPTM‐peptides is not restricted to HLA‐SE in both humans and animal models.