Affiliation:
1. University of California, San Diego
Abstract
AbstractPresidents occupy a unique role as both the head of the executive branch and a de facto party leader. They nationalize politics and polarize lawmaking. Members of Congress know this, and they leverage the president's symbolic power to heighten political conflict. I argue that lawmakers, particularly those in the nonpresidential party, invoke the president to nationalize legislative debate and polarize constituent opinion. Using the text of House and Senate floor speeches between 1973 and 2016 and a within‐member panel design, I find that legislators reference the president more frequently in the out‐party and increasingly so as a district's media environment becomes more nationalized. Presidential references are also moderated by constituency partisanship. I support the behavioral implications with a vignette experiment: when a Republican Senator invokes President Biden in a policy speech, Republican respondents increase approval of that Senator and oppose political compromise. This research highlights the institutional consequences of nationalization and negative partisanship.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference94 articles.
1. Negative Partisanship: Why Americans Dislike Parties But Behave Like Rabid Partisans;Abramowitz Alan I.,;Political Psychology,2018
2. The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of U.S. Elections in the 21st Century;Abramowitz Alan I.,;Electoral Studies,2016
3. Partisanship Nationalization in American elections: Evidence from Presidential, Senatorial, Gubernatorial Elections in the U.S. Counties, 1872–2020;Amlani Sharif,;Electoral Studies,2021
4. Educating the Least Informed: Group Endorsements in a Grassroots Campaign;Arceneaux Kevin,;American Journal of Political Science,2009