The people think what I think: False consensus and unelected elite misperception of public opinion

Author:

Furnas Alexander C.1,LaPira Timothy M.2

Affiliation:

1. Center for Science of Science and Innovation, Kellogg School of Management Northwestern University Evanston Illinois USA

2. Department of Political Science James Madison University Harrisonburg Virginia USA

Abstract

AbstractPolitical elites must know and rely faithfully on the public will to be democratically responsive. Recent work on elite perceptions of public opinion shows that reelection‐motivated politicians systematically misperceive the opinions of their constituents to be more conservative than they are. We extend this work to a larger and broader set of unelected political elites such as lobbyists, civil servants, journalists, and the like, and report alternative empirical findings. These unelected elites hold similarly inaccurate perceptions about public opinion, though not in a single ideological direction. We find this elite population exhibits egocentrism bias, rather than partisan confirmation bias, as their perceptions about others' opinions systematically correspond to their own policy preferences. Thus, we document a remarkably consistent false consensus effect among unelected political elites, which holds across subsamples by party, occupation, professional relevance of party affiliation, and trust in party‐aligned information sources.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science

Reference88 articles.

1. Measuring Representation;Achen Christopher H.;American Journal of Political Science,1978

2. Self‐Fulfilling Misperceptions of Public Polarization;Ahler Douglas J.;Journal of Politics,2014

3. Pay Rates and Subject Performance in Social Science Experiments Using Crowdsourced Online Samples;Andersen David J.;Journal of Experimental Political Science,2018

4. Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and Their Members of Congress;Bafumi Joseph;American Political Science Review,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3