Decision making in continuing professional development organisations during a crisis

Author:

Paton Morag1ORCID,Zakeri Bita2ORCID,Rowland Paula34ORCID,Tavares Walter45ORCID,Williams Betsy White67ORCID,Schneeweiss Suzan18,Wiljer David1910ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Continuing Professional Development, Temerty Faculty of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Canada

2. Bouvé College of Health Sciences Northeastern University Boston Massachusetts USA

3. Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Canada

4. The Wilson Centre University Health Network and Temerty Faculty of Medicine Toronto Canada

5. Department of Health and Society University of Toronto Scarborough Scarborough Canada

6. Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine University of Kansas, Clinical Program Kansas City Kansas USA

7. Professional Renewal Center Lawrence Kansas USA

8. Department of Pediatrics, Temerty Faculty of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Canada

9. Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Canada

10. University Health Network Toronto Canada

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionEarly in COVID‐19, continuing professional development (CPD) providers quickly made decisions about program content, design, funding and technology. Although experiences during an earlier pandemic cautioned providers to make disaster plans, CPD was not entirely prepared for this event. We sought to better understand how CPD organisations make decisions about CPD strategy and operations during a crisis.MethodsThis is a descriptive qualitative research study of decision making in two organisations: CPD at the University of Toronto (UofT) and the US‐based Society for Academic Continuing Medical Education (SACME). In March 2021, using purposive and snowball sampling, we invited faculty and staff who held leadership positions to participate in semi‐structured interviews. The interview focused on the individual's role and organisation, their decision‐making process and reflections on how their units had changed because of COVID‐19. Transcripts were reviewed, coded and analysed using thematic analysis. We used Mazmanian et al.'s Ecological Framework as a further conceptual tool.ResultsWe conducted eight interviews from UofT and five from SACME. We identified that decision making during the pandemic occurred over four phases of reactions and impact from COVID‐19, including shutdown, pivot, transition and the ‘new reality’. The decision‐making ability of CPD organisations changed throughout the pandemic, ranging from having little or no independent decision‐making ability early on to having considerable control over choosing appropriate pathways forward. Decision making was strongly influenced by the creativity, adaptability and flexibility of the CPD community and the need for social connection.ConclusionsThis adds to literature on the changes CPD organisations faced due to COVID‐19, emphasising CPD organisations' adaptability in making decisions. Applying the Ecological Framework further demonstrates the importance of time to decision‐making processes and the relational aspect of CPD. To face future crises, CPD will need to embrace creative, flexible and socially connected solutions. Future scholarship could explore an organisation's ability to rapidly adapt to better prepare for future crises.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Education,General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3