THE UBIQUITY OF DECEPTION AND THE ETHICS OF DECEPTIVE RESEARCH-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

THE UBIQUITY OF DECEPTION AND THE ETHICS OF DECEPTIVE RESEARCH

Published:2008-03 Issue:3 Volume:22 Page:147-156
ISSN:0269-9702
Container-title:Bioethics
language:en
Short-container-title:Bioethics

Author:

BENHAM BRYAN

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health Policy,Philosophy,Health(social science)

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00619.x/fullpdf

Reference23 articles.

1. Behavioral Study of obedience.

2. Some thoughts on ethics of research: After reading Milgram's "Behavioral Study of Obedience."

3. A.C. Elms. 1982. Keeping Deception Honest: Justifying Conditions for Social Scientific Research Stratagems. InEthical Issues in Social Science Research. T. Beuachamp et al., eds. Baltimore & London: John Hopkins University Press: 232-245.

4. R. Macklin. 1982. The Problem of Adequate Disclosure in Social Science Research. InEthical Issues in Social Science Research. T. Beuachamp et al., eds. Baltimore & London: John Hopkins University Press: 193-214.

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Investigating adverse daily life effects following a psychosocial laboratory stress task, and the moderating role of Psychopathology;Stress;2024-07-19

2. Assessing the acceptability of individual studies that use deception: A systematic review of normative guidance documents;Accountability in Research;2022-12-14

3. The Experimental Approach to Free Will;The Experimental Approach to Free Will;2022-02-10

4. The Experimental Approach to Free Will;2022-02-10

5. Bending Our Ethics Code;European Psychologist;2022-01