The effectiveness of interventions on changing caregivers' feeding practices with preschool children: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Wang Jian1ORCID,Chang Yan‐Shing1,Wei Xiaoxue2,Cao Yang34ORCID,Winkley Kirsty1

Affiliation:

1. Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care King's College London London UK

2. School of Nursing Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai China

3. Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics School of Medical Sciences Örebro University Örebro Sweden

4. Unit of Integrative Epidemiology Institute of Environmental Medicine Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden

Abstract

SummaryCaregivers' feeding practices are critical in shaping preschool children's eating habits and preventing childhood obesity. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of existing interventions targeting caregivers of preschool children, which aimed to promote child healthy eating and/or manage child weight and/or prevent child nutrition‐related problems and included feeding practices as one of the outcomes. Eighteen studies with 18 intervention programs and 3887 respondents that completed baseline evaluations were eligible for data synthesis. Behavior change techniques (BCTs) frequently used included the following: instruction on how to perform the behavior and demonstration of the behavior. The pooled effects of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on pressure to eat (pooled standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.61; 95%CI: −1.16, −0.06), use of food as a reward (pooled SMD = −0.31; 95%CI: −0.61, −0.01), and emotional feeding (pooled SMD = −0.36; 95%CI: −0.66, −0.06) were found statistically significant compared with control groups at post‐intervention. However, there were no pooled effects on restrictive feeding and pressure to eat at other follow‐ups or on other feeding practices at post‐intervention. Interventions may have short‐term effects on decreasing the adoption of coercive control. Future interventions should directly and adequately optimize feeding practices, include components of individual support, and contribute to the maintenance of the effects over the long term.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3