Blind spots and spotlights in bureaucratic politics: An analysis of policy co‐production in environmental governance dynamics in Indonesia

Author:

Sahide Muhammad Alif K.1ORCID,Fisher Micah R.12,Sirimorok Nurhady1,Faturachmat Fatwa1,Dhiaulhaq Ahmad3,Maryudi Ahmad45,Batiran Karno B.1,Supratman Supratman1

Affiliation:

1. Forest and Society Research Group, Faculty of Forestry Universitas Hasanuddin Makassar Indonesia

2. East West Center Honolulu Hawai'i United States

3. Research Institute for Humanity and Nature (RIHN) Kyoto Japan

4. Sebijak Institute (Research Center for Forest Policy & History), Faculty of Forestry Universitas Gadjah Mada Indonesia

5. Leadership & Policy Innovation Program, the Graduate School Universitas Gadjah Mada Indonesia

Abstract

SummaryMotivationThere has been growing interest in recent years in a better understanding of knowledge/science and policy co‐production in environmental governance.PurposeWe aim to shed more light on the politics among the numerous actors shaping ideas that drive environmental policy in Indonesia. We focus our theoretical engagement on a framing of bureaucratic politics, which is a research tradition that has made various strides in explaining the formal and non‐formal processes that influence environmental governance outcomes.Methods and approachBuilding from a wide range of case studies drawn from deep engagement of participatory research in policy‐making in Indonesia, we established a simple typology that helps explain eight categories that emerge when bureaucracies, knowledge institutions, and publics come together to shape environmental governance outcomes.FindingsThe bureaucratic politics specifically clarified the features of cases that have clear fragmentation of bureaucracy but clear explanation variables from the formal and informal interest of bureaucracy. Potential uncovered by bureaucratic politics framing means that, if the metapolitical works alter, the bureaucracy works smoothly or makes it impossible for bureaucracy to operationalize their formal and informal interest in capturing the dynamics of macro and micro politics. In terms of form of knowledge, knowledge produced “from below” can also be used in policy co‐production. It can be produced by non‐expert actors, or from dialogue among them and sympathetic experts that occur below the bureaucracy's radar (people‐driven).Policy implicationsOur ideal policy co‐production implication is where the three actors have a strong foundation of “common consciousness” and interact equally to address a particular environmental policy agenda, with enough working space to jointly commit to creating the knowledge base to shape policy.

Funder

Explorers Club

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Development,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference93 articles.

1. Joint fact finding: A strategy for bringing science, policy and the public together when matters get contentious;Adler P.;Mediate.com.,2011

2. Adler P. S. Bryan T. Mulica M. &Shapiro J.(2011 February 25).Humble inquiry. The practice of joint fact finding as a strategy for bringing science policy and the public together. Mediate.com.https://www2.mediate.com/pdf/Joint%20Fact%20Finding.pdf?_ga=2.78512340.1360106087.1678354872‐1712480722.1678354872

3. Driving participatory reforms into the ground: The bureaucratic politics of irrigation management transfer in Pakistan

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3