Affiliation:
1. Laboratory of Brain and Cognition National Institute of Mental Health Bethesda Maryland USA
2. School of Philosophy The Australian National University Canberra Australia
Abstract
AbstractThe medium‐independence of computational descriptions has shaped common conceptions of computational explanation. So long as our goal is to explain how a system successfully carries out its computations, then we only need to describe the abstract series of operations that achieve the desired input–output mapping, however they may be implemented. It is argued that this abstract conception of computational explanation cannot be applied to so‐called real‐time computing systems, in which meeting temporal deadlines imposed by the systems with which a device interfaces are constitutive of the computing tasks that a device performs. Instead, real‐time computing reveals the need for alternative conceptions of computational explanation, as well as computational implementation, that eschew medium‐independence.
Funder
National Institute of Mental Health
Templeton World Charity Foundation