A novel strategy for improving bowel preparation based on social software‐enhanced education: A prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study

Author:

Yang Xin1,Xiao Yufeng1,Zhao Zhifeng2,Yu Shuang3,Liu En1,Xiao Xiao4,Ning Shoubin5,Zheng Suyun6,Gong Yanan7,Zhou Lei8,Liu Weijia1,Lin Hui9,Ji Rui7,Zhang Heng8,Bai Jianying1,Yang Shiming1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gastroenterology The Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University Chongqing China

2. Department of Gastroenterology The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University Shen Yang China

3. Department of Gastroenterology Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital Chongqing China

4. Department of Gastroenterology Chongqing University Central Hospital Chongqing China

5. Department of Gastroenterology Air Force Medical Center Beijing China

6. Department of Gastroenterology Qujing City First People's Hospital Qujing China

7. Department of Gastroenterology The First Hospital of Lanzhou University Lanzhou China

8. Department of Gastroenterology, Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China

9. Department of Epidemiology Army Medical University Chongqing China

Abstract

AbstractBackground and AimThe compliance and timeliness of oral laxatives have always been the key factors restricting bowel preparation (BP). We have constructed a novel enhanced‐educational content and process based on social software (SS) for BP to optimize these issues.MethodsA multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study was conducted at 13 hospitals in China from December 2019 to December 2020. A total of 1774 enrollees received standard instructions for BP and were randomly assigned (1:1) to the SS group (SSG) that received a smartphone‐based enhanced‐education strategy starting 4 h before colonoscopy or the control group (CG).ResultsA total of 3034 consecutive outpatient colonoscopy patients were assessed for eligibility, and 1774 were enrolled and randomly assigned. Ultimately, data from 1747 (SSG vs CG: 875 vs 872) enrollees were collected. The BP adequacy rate was 92.22% (95% CI: 90.46–93.98) in the SSG vs 88.05% (95% CI: 85.91–90.18) in the CG (P = 0.005), and the total Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores (6.89 ± 1.15 vs 6.67 ± 1.15, P < 0.001) of those in the SSG were significantly higher than those in the CG. The average number of polyps detected in the SSG was considerably higher than that in the CG (0.84 ± 2.00 vs 0.53 ± 1.19, P = 0.037), and the average diameter of the polyps was significantly lower than that of the control group (4.0 ± 2.5 vs 4.9 ± 3.7, P < 0.001).ConclusionsThis SS‐enhanced education strategy can improve the BP adequacy rate and increase the average number of polyps detected, especially those of small diameter.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3