Relevance of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale subitems for best revascularization therapy in minor stroke patients with large vessel occlusion: An observational multicentric study

Author:

Palazzo Paola1,Padlina Giovanna2,Dobrocky Tomas3,Strambo Davide1ORCID,Seners Pierre4ORCID,Mechtouff Laura5ORCID,Turc Guillaume6ORCID,Rosso Charlotte7ORCID,Almiri William3,Antonenko Kateryna2ORCID,Laksiri Nadia8,Sibon Igor9ORCID,Detante Olivier10,Mordasini Pasquale311,Michel Patrik1ORCID,Heldner Mirjam R.2ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Neurology Service, Stroke Centre Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne Switzerland

2. Stroke Research Center Bern, Department of Neurology, Inselspital University Hospital and University of Bern Bern Switzerland

3. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital University Hospital and University of Bern Bern Switzerland

4. Neurology Department Hôpital Fondation A. de Rothschild Paris France

5. Stroke Department Hospices Civils de Lyon Lyon France

6. Department of Neurology, Hopital Sainte‐Anne, Universite de Paris and Department of Neurology, GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences Inserm U1266 Universite Paris Cite FHU NeuroVasc Paris France

7. Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, UPMC Univ Paris 06 UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM) and APHP‐Urgences Cérébro‐Vasculaires, Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtrière Paris France

8. Neurology Department La Timone University Hospital Marseille France

9. Department of Neurology, Stroke Unit CHU Bordeaux Bordeaux France

10. Neurology Department Stroke Unit, Inserm U1216, CHU Grenoble Alpes, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences Grenoble France

11. Department of Neuroradiology St. Gallen Kantonsspital St. Gallen Switzerland

Abstract

AbstractBackground and purposeThe best management of acute ischemic stroke patients with a minor stroke and large vessel occlusion is still uncertain. Specific clinical and radiological data may help to select patients who would benefit from endovascular therapy (EVT). We aimed to evaluate the relevance of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) subitems for predicting the potential benefit of providing EVT after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT; “bridging treatment”) versus IVT alone.MethodsWe extracted demographic, clinical, risk factor, radiological, revascularization and outcome data of consecutive patients with M1 or proximal M2 middle cerebral artery occlusion and admission NIHSS scores of 0–5 points, treated with IVT ± EVT between May 2005 and March 2021, from nine prospectively constructed stroke registries at seven French and two Swiss comprehensive stroke centers. Adjusted interaction analyses were performed between admission NIHSS subitems and revascularization modality for two primary outcomes at 3 months: non‐excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 2–6) and difference in NIHSS score between 3 months and admission.ResultsOf the 533 patients included (median age 68.2 years, 46% women, median admission NIHSS score 3), 136 (25.5%) initially received bridging therapy and 397 (74.5%) received IVT alone. Adjusted interaction analysis revealed that only facial palsy on admission was more frequently associated with excellent outcome in patients treated by IVT alone versus bridging therapy (odds ratio 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.24–0.91; p = 0.013). Regarding NIHSS difference at 3 months, no single NIHSS subitem interacted with type of revascularization.ConclusionsThis retrospective multicenter analysis found that NIHSS subitems at admission had little value in predicting patients who might benefit from bridging therapy as opposed to IVT alone. Further research is needed to identify better markers for selecting EVT responders with minor strokes.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3