Has the Reporting Quality of Systematic Review Abstracts in Nursing Improved Since the Release of PRISMA for Abstracts? A Survey of High‐Profile Nursing Journals-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

登录注册会员服务联系我们

Has the Reporting Quality of Systematic Review Abstracts in Nursing Improved Since the Release of PRISMA for Abstracts? A Survey of High‐Profile Nursing Journals

Published:2020-04 Issue:2 Volume:17 Page:108-117
ISSN:1545-102X
Container-title:Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
language:en
Short-container-title:Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing

Author:

Jiancheng Wang¹,Jinhui Tian²,Lin Han³,Yuxia Ma⁴,Juxia Zhang⁵

Affiliation:

1. Department of Elder Gansu Provincial Hospital Lanzhou Gansu China

2. Evidence‐Based Medicine Center Institute of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine School of Basic Medical Sciences Lanzhou University Lanzhou Gansu China

3. Department of Nursing Gansu Provincial Hospital School of Nursing Lanzhou University Lanzhou Gansu China

4. School of Nursing Lanzhou University Lanzhou Gansu China

5. Department of Nursing Gansu Provincial Hospital Lanzhou Gansu China

Funder

Gansu ProvincialHospital fund

Chengguan District Science and Technology Plan Project of Lanzhou

The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,General Nursing

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/wvn.12414

Reference43 articles.

1. Systematic reviews with published protocols compared to those without: more effort, older search

2. The over-representation of significant p values in abstracts compared to corresponding full texts: A systematic review of surgical randomized trials

3. PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts

4. A comparison of quality of abstracts of systematic reviews including meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials in high‐impact general medicine journals before and after the publication of PRISMA Extension for Abstracts: A systematic review and meta‐analysis;Bigna J. J. R.;Systematic Reviews,2016

5. Establishing a Minimum Dataset for Prospective Registration of Systematic Reviews: An International Consultation

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Evaluation of Compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Systematic Reviews in Three Major Periodontology Journals;The Open Dentistry Journal;2024-09-12

2. Quality of systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in dermatology;Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods;2024-05

3. THE REPORTING QUALITY OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ABSTRACTS IN LEADING GENERAL DENTAL JOURNALS: A METHODOLOGICAL STUDY;Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice;2023-03

4. Reporting according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses for abstracts (PRISMA-A) depends on abstract length;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology;2023-02

5. Spin in Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of Melanoma Therapies: Cross-sectional Analysis;JMIR Dermatology;2022-02-24

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线，采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统，可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容，当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种，收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇，并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询！咨询电话：010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号京ICP备18003416号-3