The impact of diagnostic method on sense ofcontrol and powerlessnessandsocial supportin endometriosis patients—A retrospective cohort study

Author:

Hanly Ciara1ORCID,Leonardi Mathew23,Eathorne Allie4,Armour Mike456ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Canada

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology McMaster University Hamilton Canada

3. Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School University of Adelaide Adelaide Australia

4. Medical Research Institute of New Zealand (MRINZ) Wellington New Zealand

5. NICM Health Research Institute Western Sydney University Sydney Australia

6. Translational Health Research Institute (THRI) Western Sydney University Sydney Australia

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionIt is recognized that for individuals living with endometriosis, receiving a diagnosis is psychosocially beneficial, but little is known about whether this is influenced by the way in which the disease is diagnosed. The primary objective of this study was to determine the impact of the diagnostic test method (clinical, diagnostic imaging, or diagnostic laparoscopy) of endometriosis on the individual's sense of control over their disease and their perceived access to social supports. The secondary objectives were to identify the impact of the diagnostic method on perceived social support, and to explore if there was a difference in the diagnostic method utilization between countries.Material and MethodsThis retrospective cohort study reports on data collected using the Endometriosis Health Profile‐30 (EHP‐30) section of a previously published larger survey conducted between May and July 2020. Women aged 18–55 years who had received a diagnosis of endometriosis were recruited by social media platforms. The two domains of interest on the EHP‐30 werecontrol and powerlessnessandsocial support. Scores on these domains were analyzed with diagnosis method as the variable of interest.ResultsIn all, 1634 valid survey responses were received. There was a small statistically significant difference found betweencontrol and powerlessnessscores for patients that received a diagnosis via imaging (ultrasound/MRI;n = 120) vs clinical diagnosis (n = 121) (p = 0.049). However, this did not reach clinical significance when covariates were controlled for (p = 0.054). No other comparisons reached statistical significance.ConclusionsThe diagnostic method of endometriosis does not appear to have a clinically significant impact on an individual's sense of control over their disease nor their access to social supports. However, further research into these domains to delineate the true impact of the diagnostic method is required.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine

Reference23 articles.

1. Endometriosis: Diagnosis and Management

2. ACOG updates guideline on diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis;Armstrong C;Am Fam Physician,2011

3. Endometriosis

4. Noninvasive U/S dx of endometriosis;Leonardi M;Contemp Ob Gyn,2020

5. Clinical diagnosis of endometriosis: a call to action;Agarwal SK;Am J Obstet Gynecol,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3