Affiliation:
1. Department of Orthodontics University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA
2. Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Riyadh Saudi Arabia
3. UF Health Science Center Libraries University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA
4. Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran
Abstract
ABSTRACTObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of technology‐enhanced learning (TEL) with traditional learning in prosthodontic education.MethodsThe protocol was registered before commencement [CRD42023390277]. The search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on comparative assessment of TEL and traditional learning in prosthodontic education up to 6 June 2024. A comprehensive search strategy was formulated, encompassing multiple electronic databases. Screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane tool (RoB 2) were performed. Educational outcomes were evaluated by Kirkpatrick's four‐level evaluation model.ResultsOf 2830 records identified, 14 RCTs were included. All the trials were judged at high risk of bias or had some concerns. The included studies assessed the short‐term benefits of various TEL approaches, including e‐learning, blended learning, video demonstration specialized self‐evaluation software and virtual reality simulation in prosthodontic education for undergraduates. Promising results were found in individual studies, particularly in terms of perceived learning conditions with problem‐based learning (PBL) and self‐reported understanding and confidence when using video demonstrations. Most studies reported comparable outcomes to traditional learning in practical skills assessments, while the results regarding the acquisition of theoretical knowledge through the incorporation of TEL approaches were contradictory. One study reported promising results in perceived learning conditions with the PBL approach, as well as improved self‐reported understanding and confidence with the use of video demonstrations. Furthermore, there was a limited number of studies assessing the effect of TEL approaches on students' behaviour.ConclusionThere is a lack of high‐quality evidence to support the adoption of TEL approaches in prosthodontics. However, the incorporation of virtual reality simulation has demonstrated promising results, particularly in improving practical clinical skills.