Enpatoran in COVID‐19 pneumonia: Safety and efficacy results from a phase II randomized trial

Author:

McKinnon John E.1ORCID,Santiaguel Joel2,Murta de Oliveira Claudia3,Yu Dongzi4,Khursheed Mukhy5,Moreau Flavie6,Klopp‐Schulze Lena7,Shaw Jamie8,Roy Sanjeev9,Kao Amy H.10,

Affiliation:

1. Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA

2. Division of Pulmonary Medicine University of the Philippines Manila Philippines

3. Ambulatório de Pesquisa Clínica, Santa Casa de Misericórdia Belo Horizonte Brazil

4. Global Clinical Development, EMD Serono Billerica Massachusetts USA

5. Global Patient Safety Merck Serono Ltd. Feltham, UK, an affiliate of Merck KGaA Darmstadt Germany

6. Global Biostatistics, EMD Serono Billerica Massachusetts USA

7. Translational Medicine, the healthcare business of Merck KGaA Darmstadt Germany

8. Translational Medicine, EMD Serono Billerica Massachusetts USA

9. Global Clinical Development Ares Trading SA, Eysins, Switzerland, an affiliate of Merck KGaA Darmstadt Germany

10. Research Unit – Neuroscience & Immunology EMD Serono Billerica Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractEnpatoran is a selective inhibitor of toll‐like receptors 7 and 8 (TLR7/8) that potentially targets pro‐inflammatory pathways induced by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2). A phase II study conducted in Brazil, the Philippines, and the USA during the early pandemic phase assessed the safety and efficacy of enpatoran in patients hospitalized with COVID‐19 pneumonia (NCT04448756). A total of 149 patients, who scored 4 on the World Health Organization's (WHO) 9‐point ordinal severity scale, were randomized 1:1:1 and received enpatoran 50 mg (n = 54) or 100 mg (n = 46), or placebo (n = 49) twice daily (b.i.d.) for 14 days plus standard of care. The primary objectives were safety and time to recovery (WHO 9‐point scale ≤3). Clinical deterioration (WHO 9‐point scale ≥ 5) was a key secondary objective. Treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were comparable across groups (56.5%–63.0%). Treatment‐related TEAEs were numerically higher with enpatoran 50 mg (14.8%) than 100 mg (10.9%) or placebo (8.2%). Serious TEAEs were numerically lower with enpatoran (50 mg 9.3%, 100 mg 2.2%) than placebo (18.4%). The primary efficacy objective was not met; median time to recovery was 3.4–3.9 days across groups, with placebo‐treated patients recovering on average faster than anticipated. Clinical deterioration event‐free rates up to Day 7 were 90.6%, 95.6%, and 81.6% with enpatoran 50 mg, 100 mg, and placebo, respectively. Enpatoran was well tolerated by patients acutely ill and hospitalized with COVID‐19 pneumonia. Positive signals in some secondary end points suggested potential beneficial effects, supporting further evaluation of enpatoran in patients with hyperinflammation due to infection or autoimmunity.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3