Pharmacological treatments for alcohol dependence: Evidence on uptake, inequalities and comparative effectiveness from a UK population‐based cohort

Author:

Manca Francesco1ORCID,Zhang Lisong1,Fitzgerald Niamh2ORCID,Ho Frederick1,Innes Hamish3,Jani Bhautesh1,Katikireddi Srinivasa Vittal1ORCID,McAuley Andrew3,Sharp Clare2,Lewsey Jim1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Health and Wellbeing University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom

2. Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport & Institute for Social Marketing University of Stirling Stirling United Kingdom

3. School of Health and Life Sciences Glasgow Caledonian University Glasgow United Kingdom

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionWe assessed the prevalence of prescribing of certain medications for alcohol dependence and the extent of any inequalities in receiving prescriptions for individuals with such a diagnosis. Further, we compared the effectiveness of two of the most prescribed medications (acamprosate and disulfiram) for alcohol dependence and assessed whether there is inequality in prescribing either of them.MethodsWe used a nationwide dataset on prescriptions and hospitalisations in Scotland, UK (N = 19,748). We calculated the percentage of patients receiving alcohol dependence prescriptions after discharge, both overall and by socio‐economic groups. Binary logistic regressions were used to assess the odds of receiving any alcohol‐dependence prescription and the comparative odds of receiving acamprosate or disulfiram. Comparative effectiveness in avoiding future alcohol‐related hospitalisations (N = 11,239) was assessed using Cox modelling with statistical adjustment for potential confounding.ResultsUpto 7% of hospitalised individuals for alcohol use disorder received prescriptions for alcohol dependence after being discharged. Least deprived socio‐economic groups had relatively more individuals receiving prescriptions. Inequalities in prescribing for alcohol dependence existed, especially across sex and comorbidities: males had 12% (odds ratio [OR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81–0.96) and those with a history of mental health hospitalisations had 10% (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82–0.98) lower odds of receiving prescriptions after an alcohol‐related hospitalisation. Prescribing disulfiram was superior to prescribing acamprosate in preventing alcohol‐related hospitalisations (hazard ratio ranged between 0.60 and 0.81 across analyses). Disulfiram was relatively less likely prescribed to those from more deprived areas.Discussion and ConclusionsInequalities in prescribing for alcohol dependence exists in Scotland with lower prescribing to men and disulfiram prescribed more to those from least deprived areas.

Funder

Alcohol Change UK

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3