Meta‐analysis of head‐to‐head clinical trials comparing incretin‐based glucose‐lowering medications and basal insulin: An update including recently developed glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) receptor agonists and the glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/GLP‐1 receptor co‐agonist tirzepatide

Author:

Nauck Michael A.1ORCID,Mirna Abd El Aziz1,Quast Daniel R.1

Affiliation:

1. Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism Section, Medical Department I Katholisches Klinikum Bochum gGmbH, St. Josef‐Hospital, Ruhr‐University Bochum Bochum Germany

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo assess comparative efficacy, safety and tolerability of injectable incretin‐based glucose‐lowering medications (IBGLMs) versus basal insulin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes.Research Design and MethodsWe performed an updated meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials of head‐to‐head comparisons of IBGLMs (short‐ and long‐acting glucagon‐like peptide‐1 [GLP‐1] receptor agonists [GLP‐1RAs] and glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide [GIP]/GLP‐1 receptor co‐agonist tirzepatide) versus basal insulin using a PubMed database search (April 2022). The primary endpoint was difference in reduction of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) versus baseline between pooled IBGLMs (fixed‐effects meta‐analysis) and their subgroups (random‐effects meta‐analysis) versus basal insulin treatment (mean differences). Secondary endpoints were fasting plasma glucose, body weight, HbA1c target achievement, hypoglycaemia, blood pressure and lipids. Risk of bias assessment was performed using Jadad scores and the Risk of Bias tool 2.0.ResultsIn all, 20 studies, representing 47 study arms and 11 843 patients, were eligible. Compared with basal insulin, IGBLMs lowered HbA1c by 0.48 (0.45‐0.52)% more than did basal insulin treatment. This effect was driven by pooled long‐acting GLP‐1RAs (ΔHbA1c −0.25 [−0.38; −0.11]%) and the only GIP/GLP‐1 receptor co‐agonist, tirzepatide (pooled doses; ΔHbA1c −0.90 [−1.06; −0.75]%), while short‐acting GLP‐1RAs were equally effective compared with basal insulin (P = 0.90). All IBGLM subgroups achieved significantly lower body weight versus insulin treatment (−4.6 [−4.7; −4.4] kg), in particular tirzepatide (−12.0 [−13.8; −10.1] kg). IBGLMs significantly reduced hypoglycaemia and blood pressure and improved lipid variables. Risk of bias was low. IBGLM treatment was associated with more nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea and study medication discontinuation.ConclusionsRecently introduced, highly effective IBGLMs were superior to basal insulin treatment, reinforcing the recommendation that IBGLMs should be considered as the first injectable treatment for most patients with type 2 diabetes.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Endocrinology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3