Use of a web‐based portal to return normal individual research results in Early Check: Exploring user behaviors and attitudes

Author:

Cope Heidi1,Lincoln‐Boyea Beth1,Gwaltney Angela You1,Biesecker Barbara B.1,Moultrie Rebecca1,Alexander Amir A.2,King Nancy M. P.3,Check Jennifer4,Corbo Allyson1,Tzeng Janice1,Porter Katherine Ackerman1,Peay Holly L.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center RTI International Research Triangle Park North Carolina USA

2. Department of Biostatistics and Data Science Wake Forest University School of Medicine Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA

3. Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy Wake Forest University School of Medicine Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA

4. Department of Pediatrics Wake Forest University School of Medicine Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA

Abstract

AbstractEarly Check is a voluntary, large‐scale expanded newborn screening study in North Carolina that uses a self‐directed web‐based portal for return of normal individual research results (IRR). Little is known about participant perspectives in using web‐based portals to receive IRR. This study explored user attitudes and behaviors within the Early Check portal using three methods: (1) a feedback survey available to the consenting parent of participating infants (typically mothers), (2) semi‐structured interviews conducted with a subset of parents, and (3) Google Analytics. During an approximate 3‐year period, 17 936 newborns received normal IRR and there were 27 812 visits to the portal. Most surveyed parents reported viewing their baby's results (86%, 1410/1639). Parents largely found the portal easy to use to get results, and helpful in understanding the results. However, 10% of parents said it was difficult to find enough information to understand their baby's results. In Early Check, providing normal IRR via the portal made a large‐scale study practical, and was highly rated by most users. Return of normal IRR may be particularly amenable to web‐based portals, as the consequences to participants from not viewing results are modest, and the interpretation of a normal result is relatively straightforward.

Funder

John Merck Fund

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Genetics (clinical),Genetics

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3