Affiliation:
1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
2. Center for Dental Implants De Mondhoek Apeldoorn The Netherlands
3. Department of Restorative Dentistry Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
Abstract
AbstractObjectivesTo compare the clinical performance of single crowns in the posterior maxilla supported by either 11‐mm long implants combined with maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) surgery or by 6‐mm long implants during a 10‐year follow‐up period.Materials and MethodsSubjects were randomly allocated to receive one 11‐mm long implant in combination MFSA or to receive one 6‐mm long implant without any grafting. Twenty‐one implants in 20 patients were placed in the 6‐mm group and 20 implants in 18 patients were placed in the 11‐mm group. Both groups were followed by clinical and radiographic examinations up to 10 years. Patients' satisfaction was also scored before treatment.ResultsTwo patients died and eight patients moved during the follow‐up. Two patients lost an implant in the 6‐mm group and one implant was lost in the 11‐mm group (implant survival 89.5% and 90.9%, respectively). From loading to 10 years' follow‐up, mean ± SE marginal bone loss in the 6‐mm group and 11‐mm group was 0.18 ± 0.10 mm and 0.26 ± 0.12 mm, respectively, without a significant difference between the groups at 10 years (p = .650). In both groups, indices scores for plaque, calculus, gingiva and bleeding were low as well as mean pocket probing depth. Patients' satisfaction at 10 years was high in both groups; mean overall satisfaction in the 6‐mm group and 11‐mm group was 9.6 ± 0.6 and 9.2 ± 0.8, respectively (p = .168).ConclusionsPlacement of 6‐mm implants or 11‐mm implants combined MFSA are equally successful during a 10‐year follow‐up period when applied for supporting a single restoration.