Affiliation:
1. Department of Emergency Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
2. Department of Emergency Medicine University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA
3. Department of Emergency Medicine Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York USA
4. VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System Michigan Ann Arbor USA
5. Division of Hospital Medicine University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA
6. University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA
7. Department of Health Systems and Population Health University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
8. VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Washington USA
9. Center for Clinical Management Research VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System Ann Arbor Michigan USA
Abstract
AbstractObjectivesUse of acute care telemedicine is growing, but data on quality, utilization, and cost are limited. We evaluated a Veterans Affairs (VA) tele–emergency care (tele‐EC) pilot aimed at reducing reliance on out‐of‐network (OON) emergency department (ED) care, a growing portion of VA spending. With this service, an emergency physician virtually evaluated selected Veterans calling a nurse triage line.MethodsCalls to the triage line occurring January–December 2021 and advised to seek care acutely within 24 h were included. We described tele‐EC user characteristics, common triage complaints, and patterns in referral to and management by tele‐EC. The primary outcome was acute care visits (ED, urgent care, and hospitalizations at VA and OON sites) within 7 days of the index call. Secondary outcomes included mortality, OON acute care spending, and the effect of tele‐EC visit modality (phone vs. video). We used both standard regression and instrumental variable (IV) analysis, using the tele‐EC physician schedule as the instrument.ResultsOf 7845 eligible calls, 15.5% had a tele‐EC visit, with case resolution documented in 57%. Compared to standard nurse triage, tele‐EC users were less likely to be Black, had more prior ED visits, and were triaged as higher acuity. Calls concerning dizziness/syncope, blood in stool, and chest pain were most likely to have a tele‐EC visit. Tele‐EC was associated with fewer ED visits than standard nurse triage in both regression (average marginal effect [AME] −16.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] −19.2 to −14.4) and IV analyses (AME −17.5%, 95% CI −25.1 to −9.8), lower hospitalization rate (AME −3.1%, 95% CI −6.2 to −0.0), and lower OON spending (AME –$248, 95% CI −$458 to −$38).ConclusionsAmong Veterans initially advised to seek care within 24 h, use of tele‐EC compared to standard phone triage led to decreased ED visits, hospitalizations, and OON spending within 7 days.
Funder
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Subject
Emergency Medicine,General Medicine
Reference34 articles.
1. ED patients: how nonurgent are they? Systematic review of the emergency medicine literature
2. Reasons for emergency department use: do frequent users differ?;Doran KM;Am J Manag Care,2015
3. MooreBJ LiangL.Costs of Emergency Department Visits in the United States 2017. HCUP Statistical Brief #268.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville MD.2020. Accessed September 21 2022.www.hcup‐us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb268‐ED‐Costs‐2017.pdf
4. Healthcare spending in U.S. emergency departments by health condition, 2006–2016
5. R46964: Department of Veterans Affairs FY2022 appropriations;Panangala SV;Congressional Research Service,2022